top of page

The Smallness in Bigness

Making sense of the Other Singapore

through Tan Pin Pin’s Singapore Gaga

2017

It is managed by a regime that has excluded accident and random-ness: even its nature is entirely remade. It is pure intention: if there is chaos, it is authored chaos: if it is ugly, it is designed ugliness; if it is absurd, it is willed absurdity.

Rem Koolhaas in Singapore Songlines

photo6106921738446153927.jpg

The Other Orchard

Youths dancing at Scape's open spaces

In Singapore Songlines, Rem Koolhaas argued that ‘In spite of its colossal substance, Singapore is doomed to remain a Potemkin metropolis’ (Koolhaas, 1997). Singapore has always prided itself to be one of the most livable cities. However, this image of a clean-and-green city-state of over 5 million was often taken by many to be artificial branding. In Rem Koolhaas’ words, a ‘Potemkin metropolis’ that is over-regulated, planned to the smallest details, leaving no room for self-expressions and surprises (Koolhaas, 1997).

 

Coming from a small town on the periphery of Kuala Lumpur, I am often bewildered by the beautiful skylines of Singapore, with its towering skyscrapers, coexisting with pockets of gardens and dots of public spaces. Being an architecture student, I came to learn about the various challenges and decisions the urban planners, architects made in the course of building the city-state. Until recently, I recalled one of our first discussions in class, regarding our views of Singapore’s city-planning and was intrigued by the views of other city folks living in this little red dot: Singapore being an overly manicured landscape. I started to wonder whether is it not possible to be a well-planned city and yet, at the same time, be a place for people of all walks of life to express themselves. Is it possible for Singapore’s regulated urban space be also a common place for expressions of individualism?

In this sense, Tan Pin Pin’s Singapore Gaga sets a contrasting landscape against Rem Koolhaas’ Singapore Songlines. Through Tan Pin Pin’s Singapore Gaga, we see the image of the Other Singapore. The uncle who deemed himself as a ‘national treasure’ performing a combination of harmonica, juggling and red wooden clogs. The ‘Hello One Dollar’ auntie selling tissue paper at the doorsteps of an MRT station. The dialect-speaking narrators at Chinese radio stations reading daily news in dialects to a dwindling population of radio-listeners (Tan, 2005). These are some of the aural landscapes of the other side of Singapore, one that we often brushed past as we hurried to our next destination (Tan, 2005). These are the scenes that are often forgotten, left undocumented and not talked about. Yet, through Tan’s film, we could see the slippages of smallness in this otherwise big city. It is possible in the vast overplanned landscape of Singapore, there are urban spaces in pockets of the city where one has room for self-expressions, whether in terms of music, art, cultural activities, etc.

 

In this review, I will continue to ramble through Tan Pin Pin’s Singapore Gaga to make sense of the urban spaces of the city-state, attempting to make sense of the often neglected, other side of Singapore. Whether we have room for the ‘Other’ to propagate. Whether it is possible to plan ‘Other’. Or should it be left unregulated. Hence, ultimately, this review seeks reconciliation between the planned and the unplanned, in order to find the smallness in bigness of the city we live in.

Making Sense of Tan's Cinematic Experience

LIGHTS CAMERA ACTION

In Singapore Gaga, through the filming techniques Tan had employed, the 55-minute long documentary is a montage of varied spaces of Singapore. It developed a counter narrative against the typical backdrop of Singapore’s narrative of being a cosmopolitan city that is clean and green. Instead, Tan captured controversial human subjects, evoke memories and nostalgia. In the process, she provided us a different cinematic experience through the spaces that she had filmed (Chee, 2015). For instance, in the scenes of her interviewing the ‘Hello One dollar’ auntie, the juxtaposition of closed-up shots and long-range shots from a corner, frames the bustling corridor in which the human subject was in, bringing to our attention a typical urban space in which we always passed through without giving any thoughts to the small little things happening at the corner,  in this case, the ‘Hello One dollar’ auntie selling tissue paper as she sang her jingles (Tan, 2005).

 

 

While the use of montage is not new to film-making, montaging fragments of narratives in Singapore Gaga enforces a different kind of space (Chee, 2015). In the transitions between these fragments of narratives, Tan would include gaps and silences that highlight the different spaces in Singapore’s variegated urbanized space (Chee, 2015). Through these network of spaces in between and within the montaged sequences of narratives, there lies a new perspective to urban spaces that change with time, history and context, quietly challenging the ‘static conception of urban space embedded in state planning agencies’ psyche’ (Chee, 2015). Therefore, through these montages, the often forgotten spaces and people are highlighted in the bigger realm of Singapore’s urban spaces.

Thoughts about the 'Other' in Singapore

NEXT!

Dressed in a singlet and a pair of shorts, an old, wrinkled man clogging in the midst of the bustling Raffles Place MRT station, playing the harmonica while juggling. This was one of the opening scenes of Singapore Gaga (Tan, 2005). A few minutes into the documentary, internationally-acclaimed Margaret Leng Tan’s interview followed and subsequently, her wildly successful John Cage’s 4’33’’ performance on a toy piano in the void deck. Looking at these two isolated scenes together, they anchored the documentary as a montage of often neglected, unseen sonic landscapes of Singapore. Contrasting the two scenes, it also raises a question of music being a form of fine arts that shapes Singapore’s culture. Why is it that a western-educated Singaporean musician playing the piano in absolute silence is so readily acclaimed and deemed avant-garde, pushing the boundaries of arts? On the contrary, the man performing his version of harmonica while doing juggling acts is deemed as a nuisance of noise, let alone to be deemed as having any form of cultural value?

 

In the past two decades, Singapore has constantly been developing its arts and music scene. Through its Renaissance City plan (unveiled in 2000), Singapore has transformed from ‘a barren wasteland’ into a lively, dynamic art and music scene of Southeast Asia (Arts and Heritage Development Division, 2008).  In addition, what comes out of such comprehensive, big-thinking approach to nurturing cultural talents were iconic architectural projects like Esplanade – Theatre on the Bay for music and the National Gallery Singapore that hosts a vast collection of Southeast Asian arts (Arts and Heritage Development Division, 2008). These venues become the formal urban spaces for the propagation of Singapore’s culture. In recent years, state agencies also planned large-scale international events like the Singapore Biennale to promote international exchanges of art and music (Arts and Heritage Development Division, 2008). While this can be seen as a conscious effort to help budding artists and performers in Singapore to have a platform for cultural exchanges, Singapore’s cultural scene is very much planned and regulated with a top-down approach. In a way, the arts and music in Singapore are also commodified into mere products that contribute to Singapore’s economic growth and a tool to build national identity.

 

In contrast, informal expressions of arts and music seem to be not tolerated. Small acts of artistic, individualist expressions were often rejected by the state and as such, these acts were usually regulated or even censored. For instance, in 2012, Samantha Lo, aka the ‘Sticker Lady’, was pasting monochrome stickers with slogans like ‘Press Once can already la’ and ‘My grandfather road’ on street signs and pedestrian crossing (MacKinnon, 2012). This was taken to be vandalism, rather than being self-expression of art in the urbanized city. This intolerance is not only portrayed by the State, but also the general public. In Singapore Gaga, the harmonica performance by the uncle were either ignored by the fast-paced white collar workers or were frowned upon by public (Tan, 2005). His performance which he himself considered as a one-of-a-kind art that is of ‘national treasure’ status were more likely taken to be a disturbance. These little acts of self-expression that were happening away from the formal performance venues were often dismissed and/or overlooked by the State and the public.

 

Having said that, fortunately, the sheer fact of these examples also highlighted that in Singapore, we still have these self-expressions occurring. Despite the big-thinking planning Singapore has towards culture, we still see the manifestation of arts and music at a very personal level. These arts and musical forms though often unrecognized by formal organizations, they do exist and are increasing. These art and music forms are often people-led, self-made and seen at community level, usually away from the eyes of the State. For example, for several years, an uncle in Woodlands has been putting up festive decorations at his own cost as seen below in Figure 1. In Figure 2, another uncle in Yishun who wanted to beautify his void deck arranged an artistic tower of knick knacks and trinkets he collected over the years (eventually asked to be removed by town council) (Zaccheus, 2017). Therefore, it seems under the efficient planning of the State, the people has also started to reclaim the urban space for development of self-expressions, be it in art, music or cultural performances. Hence, it is possible to propagate the small, little things in this otherwise big city.

CNY.jpg

WOODLANDS LIGHT UP

Uncle fork out own money to do CNY Decorations

void.jpg

Secret Void Deck

Residents taking ownership of public void deck for expressions

Another scene that caught my attention in Singapore Gaga was the narration of news in dialects of Teochew, Hokkien, Cantonese and etc. These nightly three-minutes radio broadcasts were religiously followed by a dwindling number of taxi drivers, uncles at coffeeshop and grandmothers at home (Tan, 2005). Other than decreasing listenership, their existence is also constantly undermined by state efforts of making Mandarin the official mother tongue of the Chinese. In this case, to me, it exposes similar government policies that is intolerant of diversity. Sweeping statements seem to be made about one’s ethnicity, language and culture. This is further reflected in one’s identification in the society. A simple label of Malay, Chinese or Indian on one’s identification card has implications on education, social status and etc. I recall vividly of a friend in primary school who is a Punjab that migrated to Singapore from the Philippines. Being classified as Indian, he had to take Tamil as his mother tongue when his mother tongue was Tagalog, since he was from Philippines. In the end, he constantly flunked his exams. From these instances, it seems the political system in Singapore seems to be more involved in policing the differences in multi-culturalism, rather than breaking them down.

 

Having said that, in recent years, diversity is increasingly respected. Away from the big-thinking of policy-making, the state is gradually opening up to ideas of diversity. Its view of Singlish is more encouraging as Singlish, that was previously discouraged, is now perceived as a form of quirkiness of the society. National television now also allows the mix of languages in drama serials and even have sitcoms in dialects being aired. Hokkien channels, though not in mainstream media, were established and aired in cable via Singtel’s MioTV. These are small steps state agencies have taken to recognize the non-mainstream dialects of Singapore. Hence, perhaps, smallness can be planned to an extent and, with the silent approval of the State, there is still room for alternatives to manifest in Singapore.

Small, little spaces and where to find them

The magical spots of Singapore

So, where do we see these small acts of self-expression happening? Do the urban fabric of Singapore has space for these manifestations? A quick look at it, these small acts are rarely seen in the city centre but are flourishing in the heartlands. They can be found in informal spaces, spaces that are usually overlooked or forgotten by many. They would happen often in unexpected spaces like under bridges (piano below Esplanade Bridge), underpasses (like the uncle performing at Raffles MRT station), and especially so in HDB flats (as seen in Figure 1 and 2). The people are slowly reclaiming back space for self-expressions. These forms go beyond artistic or musical aspirations, for instance, some would claim a small plot of grass patch for gardening, building a corner of respite, wishing ‘Merry Christmas’ on the walls of the lifts, etc. The acts often happen in less regulated, unplanned spaces. Consequently, these little acts humanize the urban space we live in, inculcating a sense of ownership of the space. This in turn builds a sense of belonging in the long run.

Conclusion

The Smallness in Bigness

All in all, on the contrary of Rem Koolhaas’ Singapore Songlines, the smallness has managed to creep into the big landscape of Singapore that has been so efficiently planned and successfully executed. The urban fabric of the city is able to tolerate and accommodate individual expressions, giving space for self-actualization of diverse identities. Be it in art, music, cultural discourses, whether in formal or informal spaces, these small acts of self-expressions can propagate and add to the vibrancy of the city. They go beyond planning and often, are formed organically through human interactions and relationship. Hence, as we were making sense of the other Singapore, it is heartening to see the propagation of these little acts not only in Tan Pin Pin’s Singapore Gaga but also in the heartlands of Singapore. Therefore, while Singapore may be a big city, it is also a little red dot of diverse individual and shared expressions.

References

Who I quoted

Arts and Heritage Development Division. (2008). Singapore Renaissance City Plan 3. Singapore: Ministry of Information, Communication and the Arts.

 

Chee, L. (2015). Chasing Inuka: Rambling around Singapore through Tan Pin Pin's Films. In In Asian CInema and the Use of Space: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 59 - 76). Singapore: Routledge.

 

Koolhaas, R. (1997). SIngapore Songlines: Portrait of a Potemkin Metropolis... or Thirty Years of Tabula Rasa. In R. Koolhaas, SMLXL (pp. 1008 - 1089). New York: Monacelli Press.

 

Lim, Y. H. (2017, January 27). In Pictures: Chinese New Year decorations at HDB estates. Retrieved from The Straits Times: http://www.straitstimes.com/multimedia/photos/in-pictures-chinese-new-year-decorations-at-hdb-estates

 

MacKinnon, I. (2012, June 11). 'Sticker Lady' street lady arrested. Retrieved from The Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/singapore/9324437/Sticker-Lady-street-artist-arrested.html

 

Tan, P. P. (Director). (2005). Singapore Gaga [Motion Picture].

 

Zaccheus, M. (2017, March 2). 'Artistic' tower of items at HDB void deck trashed. Retrieved from The Straits TImes: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/artistic-tower-of-items-at-hdb-void-deck-trashed

bottom of page